More Information
Submitted: October 25, 2022 | Approved: October 29, 2022 | Published: October 31, 2022
How to cite this article: Özdin M, Yazar H, Mundan D. Neutrophil and platelet lymphocyte ratio in diabetes mellitus. Ann Adv Chem. 2022; 6: 056-059.
DOI: 10.29328/journal.aac.1001033
Copyright License: © 2022 Özdin M, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Keywords: Type II diabetes mellitus; Neutrophil lymphocyte ratio; Platelet lymphocyte ratio
Abbreviations: NLR: Neutrophil Lymphocyte Ratio; PLR: Platelet Lymphocyte Ratio; Type II DM: Type II Diabetes Mellitus; HIMS: Hospital Information Management Systems; SUTRH: Diayabet Polyclinics of Sakarya University Training and Research Hospital
Neutrophil and platelet lymphocyte ratio in diabetes mellitus
Mehmet Özdin1, Hayrullah Yazar2* and Durhasan Mundan3
1Biochemistry, Training and Research Hospital, Sakarya University, Sakarya, Turkey
2Department of Medical Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Sakarya University, Sakarya, Turkey
3Faculty of Veterinary, Harran University, Şanlıurfa, Turkey
*Address for Correspondence: Hayrullah Yazar, Associate, Department of Medical Biochemistry, Sakarya University, Faculty of Medicine, Sakarya, Turkey, Email: drhyazar@hotmail.com; hyazar@sakarya.edu.tr
Background: This study, it was aimed to investigate the relationship between Neutrophil Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) and Platelet Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR) in Type II Diabetes Mellitus (Type II DM) patients.
Methods: The data of the study were obtained from 108 patients, 61 women and 47 men, who were diagnosed with Type II DM, who applied to the Diabetes Polyclinics of Training and Research Hospital between 01.01.2020 and 30.06.2020 and a healthy control group without Type II DM. The data of the patients were obtained retrospectively via the Hospital Information Management System (HIMS).
Results: The mean age of the Type II DM patient meeting the study criteria were 57.9 ± 12.69 years. The mean age of the control group was determined as 55.8 ± 8.81. There was no significant difference between the patient and control groups in terms of age and gender. The NLR of type II DM patients was 2.96 ± 1.15 and that of the control group was 1.91 ± 0.81. The PLR of type II DM patients was found as 179.29 ± 61.81 and the PLR of the control group was found as 121.21 ± 51.33. When NLR and PLR values of type II DM patients and the control group were compared found that it was statistically significant (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: Although more analysis is needed to prove that NLR and PLR are associated with type II DM disease, our study’s high NLR and PLR values in Type II DM patients should suggest that these parameters are essential in the diagnosis and follow-up. Also, NLR and PLR inflammatory diseases, acute coronary syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis, etc., is higher, suggesting that this is related to unsanitary conditions rather than a specific disease.
Type II DM is related to the insulin hormone and is seen when this hormone is incomplete or inadequate. Type II DM is a chronic disease characterized by hyperglycemia, and its incidence and serious complications have increased in recent years [1,2]. Type II DM usually begins in humans after age 40 and is associated with obesity [3]. Leukocytes take part in our body’s immune system; it consists of two cell groups, granulocytes, and agranulocytes. As a result of the joint effect of granulocytes and agranulocytes in the body, they protect living things against harmful factors and fulfill the duty of the immune system against diseases. Granulocytes consist of neutrophils, eosinophils, basophils, mast cells, dendritic cells, monocyte-macrophages and phagocytes. Lymphocytes, on the other hand, consist of natural killer cells and some specialized cells under the “T” and “B” lymphocyte groups [4]. Lymphocytes make up about half of the circulating leukocytes. The circulating life span of lymphocytes can last from a few weeks to several years, and their lifespan is considerably longer compared to neutrophils [5]. Platelets produced in the bone marrow; are essential blood elements effective in coagulation. Platelets, besides their coagulation functions, secrete mediators against infectious agents. These mediators have been shown to coordinate inflammatory cell movements, with platelets contributing to chemotaxis and phagocytosis.
In the absence or insufficiency of platelets, there is a delay in the migration of leukocytes to the inflammation region, which reveals how essential their functions are [6,7]. NLR and Platelet-lymphocyte ratio are important markers used in the diagnosis of general inflammatory conditions in the human body [8]. It is stated that NLR and PLR are cheap and easily calculable markers that correlate with the prognosis of systemic inflammatory diseases and are frequently used in laboratories. This frequency of use can also be compared to the ratio of De-Ritis and R obtained from biochemical tests [9-11]. It has been reported that NLR and PLR have more common usage areas. Cardiovascular, rheumatological and cancer cases, especially inflammatory diseases, have been shown [12-15]. Neutrophils, lymphocytes and platelets are essential to the blood elements involved in the inflammation process. Type II DM is strongly associated with inflammation. In this study, we aimed to investigate the relationship between NLR and PLR, which are among the parameters of complete blood count and Type II DM.
Study setting, design and period
It consists of 108 patients, 61 women and 47 men diagnosed with type II DM, who applied to the Diayabet Polyclinics of Sakarya University Training and Research Hospital (SUTRH) between 01.01.2020 and 30.06.2020. Patient data were obtained retrospectively via the HIMS. One hundred eight healthy persons, 59 women and 49 men without rheumatic disease, allergic disease, autoimmune disease, infection, diabetes, or cancer, were included in the control group. Relationships and differences between the patient and control groups were investigated. Neutrophil, lymphocyte and platelet tests were performed on the CELL-DYN 3700 (ABBOTT, USA) device.
Data processing and analysis
For the statistical analysis of the data obtained from the studies, IBM SPSS Windows 20.0 (SPSS, Chicago, USA) program was used. Student t-test was used for comparisons between groups. Data are expressed as mean±standard deviation. Values of p < 0.05 were considered significant in all results.
Ethical considerations
The ethics committee report of our study was obtained from the Faculty of Medicine and its date and number are (04.09.2020-E.7742).
The average age of type II DM patients meeting the study criteria was 57.9 ± 12.69 years. The average age of the individuals in the control group was determined as 55.8 ± 8.81. There was no significant difference between the patient and control groups in terms of age and gender. The NLR of type II DM patients was 2.96 ± 1.15 and that of the control group was 1.91 ± 0.81. The PLR of type II DM patients was 179.29 ± 61.81 and that of the control group was 121.21 ± 51.33. When NLR and PLR values of type II DM patients and the control group were compared, it was found that it was statistically significant (p < 0.05) (Table 1).
Neutrophils, lymphocytes and platelets are essential to blood elements in the inflammation process. Type II DM is strongly associated with inflammation. Chronic inflammation contributes to the development and progression of chronic complications from micro and macroangiopathic changes in diabetic patients [16,17].
Studies on NLR and PLR are new and their relationship with diseases has not been sufficiently investigated. Today, it is used in some infectious and tumoral formations. Systemic inflammation triggers lymphopenia, causing an increase in NLR levels. NLR and PLR correlate with the prognosis of systemic inflammatory diseases [18]. In a study of Pfada patients, the NLR was high but not statistically significant [19]. In the study conducted on patients with nasal polyps, NLR values and thrombocyte values were found to be high [20]. An increase in NLR and PLR values was found in a study conducted with patients with acute coronary syndrome [21]. In a study conducted on 245 patients with a viral infection and positive for COVID-19, NLR values were found to be high [22]. In a study conducted on 77 people with rheumatoid arthritis, the rates of NLR and PLR were found to be statistically significant in the patient group [23]. In a study conducted on 70 patients with acute sensorineural hearing loss disease, it was found that NLR and PLR levels were significantly higher when compared with the control group [24]. In studies performed in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus [25] and diseases with inflammation [26], it was reported that NLR and PLR values showed a significant relationship. In a study conducted on 313 patients with colorectal carcinoma, NLR and PLR values were found to be statistically significant compared to the control group [27]. In a study conducted with 92 type II DM patients, the NLR was higher than the control group and was reported to be statistically significant [28]. In a study conducted on prediabetic and diabetic patients, it was determined that NLR values increased significantly. In addition, NLR and PLR values, important markers for inflammation, are important markers of inflammation and can be reliable predictive markers in prediabetes and diabetes [29]. In one study, it was found that in inflammatory diseases, the number and quality of complete blood count parameters changed, and there was a decrease in lymphocyte counts, significantly.
In contrast, neutrophil and platelet counts increased [30]. A study in patients with COVID-19 has shown that there may be a relationship between the severity of the disease and high NLR [31]. High NLR was found in a study of 300 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction [32]. In a survey conducted with 100 patients with Sjögren’s Syndrome, NLR and PLR values were found to be statistically significant compared to the control group [33].
In the study we conducted with type II DM patients, we found higher and statistically significant NLR and PLR values compared to the control group. Considering the limitations of our study, it can be stated that it is a retrospective, single-laboratory-centered study that includes a relatively small number of patients. In addition, the inability to obtain any information about the duration of diabetes in patients is among the limitations of our study.
The high and statistically significant NLR and PLR values in patients revealed that these parameters are essential in diagnosing and following Type II DM disease. These values have also shown that they can be vital biomarkers in Type II DM disease. Therefore, more research is required to establish the connection between the pathogenesis of Type II DM and the NLR and PLR. Moreover, NLR and PLR values, inflammatory diseases, acute coronary syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis, etc., considering that it is higher in many diseases, it can also think that this condition is related to unhealthy conditions rather than a specific disease.
Declarations
Ethics Committee Approval: Approval for the study was obtained from the Sakarya University Faculty of Medicine Ethics Committee (Date: 04.09.2020, Number: E.7742). The Declaration of Helsinki conducted the study.
Author contributions
Concept – MO, HY; Supervision – MO, HY; Materials – MO; Data Collection and Processing – MO, DM; Analysis and Interpretation – MO, HY; Writing –DO, MY, HY.
- Satman I. The update criteria and the reasons of them in diagnosis and follow up of diabetes mellitus. Turkiye Klinikleri J Int Med Sci 2007; 3:1-15.
- Özdin M. Tip II Diabetes Mellituslu Hastalarda Retinopati ile HbA1c Arasındaki İlişki, Balıkesir Medical Journal 2020; (2):41-45. DOI: 10.33716/bmedj.734178
- Sağlam H. Diyabet ve Enfeksiyonlar. Güncel Pediatri 2004; 2: 44-52.
- Litman GW, Cannon JP, Dishaw LJ. Reconstructing immune phylogeny: new perspectives. Nat Rev Immunol. 2005 Nov;5(11):866-79. doi: 10.1038/nri1712. PMID: 16261174; PMCID: PMC3683834.
- Pancer Z, Cooper MD. The evolution of adaptive immunity. Annu Rev Immunol. 2006;24:497-518. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.24.021605.090542. PMID: 16551257.
- Yeaman MR. Platelets: at the nexus of antimicrobial defence. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2014 Jun;12(6):426-37. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3269. PMID: 24830471.
- de Stoppelaar SF, van 't Veer C, Claushuis TA, Albersen BJ, Roelofs JJ, van der Poll T. Thrombocytopenia impairs host defense in gram-negative pneumonia-derived sepsis in mice. Blood. 2014 Dec 11;124(25):3781-90. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-05-573915. Epub 2014 Oct 9. PMID: 25301709; PMCID: PMC4263985.
- Uslu AU, Küçük A, Şahin A, Ugan Y, Yılmaz R, Güngör T, Bağcacı S, Küçükşen S. Two new inflammatory markers associated with Disease Activity Score-28 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-lymphocyte ratio. Int J Rheum Dis. 2015 Sep;18(7):731-5. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.12582. Epub 2015 Apr 21. PMID: 25900081.
- Yazar H, Kayacan Y, Ozdin M. De Ritis ratio and biochemical parameters in COVID-19 patients. Arch Physiol Biochem. 2022 Dec;128(6):1676-1680. doi: 10.1080/13813455.2020.1788604. Epub 2020 Jul 20. PMID: 32683882.
- Guzey-Aras Y, Yazar H, Acar T, Kayacan Y, Acar BA, Boncuk S, Eryilmaz HA. The Role of De Ritis Ratio as a Clinical Prognostic Parameter in COVID 19 Patients. Clin Lab. 2021 Oct 1;67(10). doi: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2021.210119. PMID: 34655209.
- Kayacan Y, Yazar H, Özdin M. Could the R-ratio be an indicator of acute liver injury for the treatment of covid-19? Ist Faculty Med. July 2, 2021. doi: 10.26650/IUITFD.2021.824074
- Pichler M, Hutterer GC, Stoeckigt C, Chromecki TF, Stojakovic T, Golbeck S, Eberhard K, Gerger A, Mannweiler S, Pummer K, Zigeuner R. Validation of the pre-treatment neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic factor in a large European cohort of renal cell carcinoma patients. Br J Cancer. 2013 Mar 5;108(4):901-7. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.28. Epub 2013 Feb 5. PMID: 23385728; PMCID: PMC3590665.
- Tamhane UU, Aneja S, Montgomery D, Rogers EK, Eagle KA, Gurm HS. Association between admission neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Am J Cardiol. 2008 Sep 15;102(6):653-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.05.006. Epub 2008 Jun 26. PMID: 18773982.
- de Jager CP, van Wijk PT, Mathoera RB, de Jongh-Leuvenink J, van der Poll T, Wever PC. Lymphocytopenia and neutrophil-lymphocyte count ratio predict bacteremia better than conventional infection markers in an emergency care unit. Crit Care. 2010;14(5):R192. doi: 10.1186/cc9309. Epub 2010 Oct 29. PMID: 21034463; PMCID: PMC3219299.
- Templeton AJ, Ace O, McNamara MG, Al-Mubarak M, Vera-Badillo FE, Hermanns T, Seruga B, Ocaña A, Tannock IF, Amir E. Prognostic role of platelet to lymphocyte ratio in solid tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014 Jul;23(7):1204-12. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-0146. Epub 2014 May 3. PMID: 24793958.
- Doupis J, Lyons TE, Wu S, Gnardellis C, Dinh T, Veves A. Microvascular reactivity and inflammatory cytokines in painful and painless peripheral diabetic neuropathy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009 Jun;94(6):2157-63. doi: 10.1210/jc.2008-2385. Epub 2009 Mar 10. PMID: 19276232; PMCID: PMC2690431.
- Fujita T, Hemmi S, Kajiwara M, Yabuki M, Fuke Y, Satomura A, Soma M. Complement-mediated chronic inflammation is associated with diabetic microvascular complication. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2013 Mar;29(3):220-6. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.2380. PMID: 23280928.
- Milner JD, Ward JM, Keane-Myers A, Paul WE. Lymphopenic mice reconstituted with limited repertoire T cells develop severe, multiorgan, Th2-associated inflammatory disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Jan 9;104(2):576-81. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0610289104. Epub 2007 Jan 3. PMID: 17202252; PMCID: PMC1761908.
- Kayabaşı S, Gül F. Pfapa sendromunda yeni öngörücü parametreler: nötrofil lenfosit oranı ve trombosit lenfosit oranı. Ortadogu Tıp Derg 2019; 11(3):231-34. DOI: 10.21601/ortadogutipdergisi.456084
- Atan D, Özcan KM, Köseoğlu S, İkincioğulları A, Çetin MA, Ensari S, Dere H. Nazal polipte yeni öngörücü parametreler: Nötrofil lenfosit oranı ve trombosit lenfosit oranı [New predictive parameters of nasal polyposis: neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and platelet to lymphocyte ratio]. Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg. 2015;25(2):97-101. Turkish. doi: 10.5606/kbbihtisas.2015.01947. PMID: 25935061.
- Tamhane UU, Aneja S, Montgomery D, Rogers EK, Eagle KA, Gurm HS. Association between admission neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Am J Cardiol. 2008 Sep 15;102(6):653-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.05.006. Epub 2008 Jun 26. PMID: 18773982.
- Liu Y, Du X, Chen J, Jin Y, Peng L, Wang HHX, Luo M, Chen L, Zhao Y. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as an independent risk factor for mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. J Infect. 2020 Jul;81(1):e6-e12. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.04.002. Epub 2020 Apr 10. PMID: 32283162; PMCID: PMC7195072.
- Kilic E, Rezvani A, Toprak AE, Erman H, Ayhan SK, Poyraz E. Romatoid Artritte Nötrofil/Lenfosit ve Platelet/Lenfosit Oranlarının Değerlendirilmesi. Dicle Tıp Dergisi. 2016; 43(2):241-47. DOI: 10.5798/diclemedj.0921.2016.02.0674
- Chung JH, Lim J, Jeong JH, Kim KR, Park CW, Lee SH. The significance of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and platelet to lymphocyte ratio in vestibular neuritis. Laryngoscope. 2015 Jul;125(7):E257-61. doi: 10.1002/lary.25204. Epub 2015 Feb 13. PMID: 25677212.
- Feng JF, Huang Y, Chen QX. Preoperative platelet lymphocyte ratio (PLR) is superior to neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as a predictive factor in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. World J Surg Oncol. 2014 Mar 19;12:58. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-12-58. PMID: 24641770; PMCID: PMC3973187.
- Boilard E, Nigrovic PA, Larabee K, Watts GF, Coblyn JS, Weinblatt ME, Massarotti EM, Remold-O'Donnell E, Farndale RW, Ware J, Lee DM. Platelets amplify inflammation in arthritis via collagen-dependent microparticle production. Science. 2010 Jan 29;327(5965):580-3. doi: 10.1126/science.1181928. PMID: 20110505; PMCID: PMC2927861.
- Kulaksızoğlu S, Merter AA. Kolorektal Kanser Hastalarında Nötrofil/Lenfosit, Trombosit/Lenfosit ve Trombosit Büyük Hücre Oranı Değerlerinin Tanıdaki Yeri. F.Ü. Sağ. Bil. Tıp. Derg. 2019; 33(3):169-73.
- Turan Y, Turan E. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio independently predicts the epicardial fat thickness in diabetic patients. Cukurova Med J 2019; 44(4): 1333-1338.
- Mertoglu C, Gunay M. Neutrophil-Lymphocyte ratio and Platelet-Lymphocyte ratio as useful predictive markers of prediabetes and diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2017 Nov;11 Suppl 1:S127-S131. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2016.12.021. Epub 2016 Dec 12. PMID: 28017281.
- Gabay C, Kushner I. Acute-phase proteins and other systemic responses to inflammation. N Engl J Med. 1999 Feb 11;340(6):448-54. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199902113400607. Erratum in: N Engl J Med 1999 Apr 29;340(17):1376. PMID: 9971870.
- Ozdin M, Kaya H, Gulacti U, Lok U, Kafadar H, Yucetas C. The diagnostic value of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in determining the severity of COVID-19. IMC J Med Sci 2022;16(1):001
- Doğan A. The relationship between residual SYNTAX score and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio in ST segment elevation myocardial infarction pat. Ann Med Res 2020; 27(9):2433-2437. DOI: 10.5455/annalsmedres.2020.05.456
- Özdin M. Sjögren Sendromu olan Hastalarda Nötrofil/Lenfosit ve Trombosit/Lenfosit Oranlarının Araştırılması. Balıkesir Medical Journal, 2021; 5(1):23-28. DOI: 10.33716bmedj.855386